Four minutes and 55 seconds. That’s all it took for the Raptors to turn a 6 point game into a 25 point margin.
The Raptors even did it without a single three point shot or three point play.
Toronto shot 6-8 from the floor and 7-8 from the line.
The Bucks only were able to hoist two shots and get a third one blocked in that 5 minutes of action. They also drew one foul (missing both free throws). The Bucks did manage to commit six fouls and four turnovers, though.
Think about that — the Raptors only made two more baskets than you would expect them to make in eight shots and they didn’t make any big (3 point) plays. They went on a 19-0 run without doing anything particularly special!
I suppose I could ream Krystkowiak for some coaching errors, but what is he supposed to do? He calls timeout after three Toronto baskets (about the right amount of time to wait), inserts Ivey and Voskuhl (which I’m not going to complain about — it’s better than not doing anything) and those two immediately commit an offensive foul and a shooting foul. Allowing your opponents to go on a run like that is on the whole team, not just the coach.
It’s easy to start throwing around “heartless” and “gutless” adjectives after events like this, but it’s important to remember that the Bucks were playing their fourth game in five nights. A bad stretch of play isn’t worth insinuating that something is lacking in one’s personality.
But stretches like this — which are becoming increasingly common in the third quarters of games, like this one, and this one from the past week, are a symptom of a greater problem. Coaching is part of it, yes, but flagging effort from players who know that the season is lost is another. But why would that effort be flagging? Tuning out the coaches, maybe?
It doesn’t surprise me that this game wasn’t close. The Bucks have had problems competing on the road against good teams all year, so why would tonight be any different? I wrote in a preview of this game for a Raptors blog that I would have been surprised if the Raptors didn’t win by double digits.
But ask yourself: Is this team really so bad that they should routinely be 20-40 points worse than their opposition?
The answer is: No.
And that is an issue that starts with the coaching strategies. Not tonight, but all season. A series of games with competitive first halves and third quarter collapses? That looks to me like a team that is willing to play hard until they run into a little adversity. That’s a team that has quit on its coach.
And meanwhile, the Timberwolves (with a 7-35 record) lost by one at Boston tonight. Just saying.
3 responses so far ↓
1 Frank // Jan 26, 2008 at 9:29 am
Great breakdown of the run. I have a hard time getting too frustrated about the defense these days because we’re all so used to it, but it’s tough watching the team bumble around on the offensive end all the time. For a team of purported shooters we sure don’t do that very well.
I would have liked to see Villanueva come in earlier (in Voskuhl’s place at least) just because he was showing energy on both ends and obviously had some motivation for a change. Not that you’d expect CV to lock down Bosh, but at that point get someone on the court who can do something offensively at least.
2 JR // Jan 26, 2008 at 3:56 pm
A list of the blowouts:
Against the Spurs – lost by 25
Against the Pistons- lost by 26
Against the Warriors- lost by 30
Against the Celtics – lost by 22
Against the Nuggets – lost by 20
Against the Pistons – lost by 45
Against the Wizards – lost by 24
Against the Warriors – lost by 20
Against the Raptors – lost by 31
Does anyone recall a team that has had that many blowouts in 44 games?
3 Devin // Jan 26, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Not much a coach can do when you have Adrian Dantley on the team. Redd is the Dantley cancer on the team.
Leave a Comment