The Bratwurst – Milwaukee Bucks Blog

All You Can Eat Milwaukee Bucks

The Bratwurst – Milwaukee Bucks Blog header image 1

Are the Bucks worse this season than last season?

January 23rd, 2008 by Brett Boyer · 5 Comments

Last year the injury-riddled Bucks often played with as many as 4 starters sidelined. They fired their coach for underachieving. While having one of the best offenses in the conference (11th best offensive rating in the league — measured as points per 100 posessions) their defense was miserable (29th in defensive rating). They were outscored by 4.4 points per game, the second worst margin in the conference.

How could it get any worse?

They hired a new coach who brought a “defense and intensity” mantra. They got their starters back, having withstood only one major injury through half of the season. However, while their offense is worse (18th offensive rating) their defense has not changed (still 29th). Most damming, they are now being outscored by 6 points per game, still the second worst margin in the conference.

What’s the difference between last year and this year — the “season of defense”? Nothing, except that the Bucks are playing at a slower pace (getting the 19th most posessions per game this season, vs. the 10th most last year). So they are allowing three fewer points per game — because the opposition is getting the ball one and a half fewer times per game. But that doesn’t really help because they score 4 fewer points per game than last year.

There is one positive that has come from this season — the Bucks are a much better rebounding team. Last season their opponents outrebounded them by 300 boards, this year they are net-positive 30 and are actually one of the top offensive rebounding teams in the league. That’s good to see — there’s probably nothing more frustrating to watch in basketball than your team constantly getting pounded on the glass.

From a talent perspective, this team should be significantly better. Bogut is much improved. Mo Williams is slightly improved and much healthier. Michael Redd is slumping a little, but is healthier. Yi Jianlian is an improvement on Brian Skinner. The only difference has been small forward — Ruben Patterson was far superior to Desmond Mason even before Mason got hurt, and the “throw it at the wall and see what sticks” combination of Simmons, Redd and Bell has been brutal at the 3. But with all the injuries last year, Patterson played a lot of power forward, so that’s not really a direct comparison.

Especially without a true small forward (and the inability of Simmons to step up this year) then this team’s ceiling was probably never much more than 42 or 43 wins (so about 20 or 21 as of today). But is there any excuse for their point differential being worse than last year? And for their offense getting worse without the defense getting better? The spotlight for that falls directly on Larry Krystkowiak.

Say what you will about Terry Stotts — but at least he kept his team from getting blown out every time they faced a good opponent. On a team of offensively talented, defensively limited players, Stotts had them firing away. It didn’t work all the time, but the Bucks stole a few games (winning at San Antonio and Golden State last year) and kept some of them surprisingly close (at Phoenix). After getting manhandled twice by Detroit this season Andrew Bogut commented that he couldn’t understand why they had played the Pistons tough for the previous couple of years but suddenly don’t look like they belong in the same league as them. Well — the difference is that now they have the same players trying to play Detroit’s style. And that wont work when the Pistons are much better suited for the defense-first game.

This is a perfect example of why NBA teams shouldn’t hire college coaches — the only way to win at the highest level is to customize your coaching strategy to maximize the strength of your players. You can’t just run “your” system because that’s what you are most comfortable doing and hope the players fit in.

What are some changes that Larry Krystkowiak has to make?

Less Royal Ivey, more Charlie Bell. Defensive ability is so hard to quantify. I’ve become convinced that except in the case of erasers like Kevin Garnett or transcendant stars like Michael Jordan the way to get a reputation as a defensive stopper has less to do with ability and more with a willingness to get into a good-looking defensive stance and look frustrated with yourself after you get beat. The bottom line is that one of these guys has to play. Ivey has no offensive game whatsoever and not nearly enough defensive ability to make up for it. Now that Bell is shooting much better, he is a far superior option — as long as he’s playing point guard and guarding players his size.

Pick up the pace. The Bucks have so many players that can score that they simply must run more. If there are more shots available for everyone then it becomes easier for players to take good shots. The defense-first thing simply isn’t working, and there’s nothing about playing at a higher pace that means you automatically play worse defense. I’d use some full-court pressure as one means of speeding things up.

Play Villanueva, Yi and Bogut together. The Bucks are the first team ever to have three athletic 7-footers, two of whom have 3-point range and one of which once starred in a Nike commercial where after dunking over some Chinese guy he started flashing gang signs. It’s a truly unique combination. Why not throw these guys out there and see what they can do? At the very least you’ll get some highlight dunks. And it keeps Michael Redd in the backcourt, where he belongs.

Don’t be so afraid to use your timeouts! After excellent first halves against Golden State and New Orleans, the Bucks came out flat in the third (another indictment of the coach, by the way). The Warriors stretched a 1 point lead to 10 in four posessions and the Hornets erased the Bucks’ lead with an 11-2 run. The flat third quarter starts doomed the Bucks in both games. Both times Krystkowiak waited too long to try and stop the runs by calling time out. Look, why save timeouts for the end of the game when if you don’t use them early you’ll be down by 20 at the end? I learned this lesson by watching Pat Riley a couple of years ago. The Heat came into Milwaukee without Shaq and playing poorly, and early on whenever the Bucks would string together two baskets he would call time out. He simply refused to let the Bucks go on a run and open the game up. And it worked — by keeping it close then he was able to let Dwyane Wade do his “can’t keep me off the foul line” act in the fourth quarter.

The bottom line is that coaches don’t win games — players do that. But it’s up to the coach to put his players in a good position to succeed. Larry Krystkowiak has failed miserably at that job, and suddenly this season has more in common with last season than anyone would think.

Tags: Charlie Bell · Charlie Villanueva · Larry Krystkowiak · Milwaukee Bucks

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Luke Uriniuk // Jan 23, 2008 at 10:58 am

    The Buck’s (Herb Kohl & Larry Harris) needed to bring in another established proven NBA head coach, like they did when they got George Karl back in the day, instead of giving the team over to another rookie coach. It really pisses me off when Larry Harris can manage to, on paper at least, put together what would seem like a decent talented team and yet not find an established coach with a system that would fit the players.
    Sadly this season i haven’t really wanted to go see games at the BC because i was so angry about the Bucks last season not making an attempt to get (the coach who is coaching the Rockets this season) to be their coach instead of promoting Larry K to that position. I felt that this season might turn out the way it’s going because of that decision. I really wanted a title contender in this town and I still believe the Bucks have pieces in place that could lead to that, yet, all i can say is what a waste.

  • 2 Brett Boyer // Jan 23, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Don’t get too bent out of shape over Rick Adelman — he’s 61 years old and was basically retired before taking the Rockets job as a favor to owner Les Alexander. He’s been a west coast guy his entire career, and would never have taken a position in a cold-weather city.

  • 3 The Marxist // Jan 23, 2008 at 6:53 pm

    My only quarrel with this post is that Simmons has not really been back for the first half of the season even though the Bucks have not formally admitted that.

    Interestingly, Simmons does seem to be playing a little better and more lately (from what I can tell from the box scores). Hopefully, this will help some in the 2nd half.

    Regarding Larry K, it seems to me the question is whether or not he is learning and improving. I agree whole-heartedly that Stotts seemed to be able to get more out of mainly the same players and one of the dozen or less top-line NBA coaches could probably lead to 2-5 more victories for these players. However, this is capitalism and ‘our’ capitalist is a small to mid-level capitalist.

  • 4 ry // Jan 25, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    I believe coach K is the problem. I had some hope at the beginning of the season with the whole defensive mantra. But he has mismanaged this team on so many occasions it is really the main reason the Buck are doing so horribly this season. They are at least a .500 team. I’d have to check last year’s stats but doubt there were so many games (as is the case this year) where the Bucks scored 10 or so points in a quarter (like tonight against Toronto) and essentially lost otherwise close games in short 6-8 minutes stretches of a game. Why not hire Carlisle?

  • 5 foolonthehill // Feb 1, 2008 at 4:30 pm

    I’ve been a Bucks fan for my whole life, seeing my first Bucks game in 1968 as a cub scout. Yep, I’m an old bratwurst if you will….Except for those early years and the years with Nellie and the fluke season with Porter, the Bucks are and have been an average to below average team. Milwaukee has come to accept it and just lets it be. Look at the Lakers today. That is what championship organizations do; Bynum goes goes down so they put together a deal that will propel them to the NBA championship or at least the Western Conference finals. I hate the Lakers and I hate Kobe but you gotta love the move. Look at Boston….same thing. Hate Boston but look what they did.
    I love the Bucks and have been to countless games during my life and watch them like a religion on television. Like Luke said, they look so good on paper….what the hell is the problem? Rookie coach. No all-star caliber small forward. Shoot, we can trade Gadzuric, Simmons, Mason, and even Villanueva to get a bona fide legit small forward. Every elite team in the NBA has a killer small forward; we don’t. Bogut, Yi, Redd (g-ball), and Mo are solid and Bell, after a rough start, are top caliber players. Will we trade? No, of course not. We’ll keep going on like we have been with 3 lottery picks on our team and a losing record. We’ll fire the coach or trade the wrong guy like Bogut or Yi and we’ll sit here and watch Bucks basketball still saying, shoulda, coulda, woulda. It just makes me watch the Badgers and Marquette that much more. Still, I just wish we could have a good run of quality teams before i start drooling in my wheel chair.

Leave a Comment