The Bratwurst – Milwaukee Bucks Blog

All You Can Eat Milwaukee Bucks

The Bratwurst – Milwaukee Bucks Blog header image 1

Where will Gerald Wallace land?

July 3rd, 2007 by Brett Boyer · 7 Comments

With the news that the Bucks have offered Mo Williams a 5 year, $40 million contract, it appears that they are passing on Chauncey Billups and will certainly turn toward Gerald Wallace. Who are their competitors for Wallace?
The teams that have shown early interest in Wallace include Charlotte, Milwaukee, Dallas, Golden State, Memphis, Miami, Orlando and Portland. Since Orlando signed Rashard Lewis (max deal? Whew, don’t know about that.) they are out of the running. Besides Charlotte, only Milwaukee and Memphis can offer Wallace more than the midlevel exception, so any other deal would be a sign-and-trade in order for him to get a contract in the $10-$12 million range.
My list of potential destinations (in reverse order of likliehood):
Dallas: Why are they making overtures here? Last I saw, the Mav’s second best player is a 27-year-old all-star who already plays small forward. Clearly Josh Howard isn’t going anywhere, so why would Wallace want to go there? The immediate opportunity to win carries some weight, but Wallace would only get about 20 minutes a game, with much of that coming out of position. A sign-and-trade of Wallace for Josh Howard and Devin Harris would be way too much for Dallas to give up.
Miami: At first glance, the chance to play with Dwyane Wade and Shaq sounds great, but the Big Fella is close to the end and the rest of that team is a complete house of cards. The chance to win isn’t as great as it seems. Also, Miami really doesn’t have much to offer in a trade. Jason Williams is in the last year of his contract, but Charlotte already has a 35 mpg point guard and doesn’t need the expiring deal (plus that would leave Miami without anyone at the point). Everyone else on the Heat has a horrible contract (Antoine Walker) or isn’t terribly desirable (Dorell Wright).
Memphis: It makes some sense for Memphis to pursue Wallace since they are trying to get young, and since they are turning the reigns over to a rookie point guard, are probably a couple of years away from contending. But Memphis already has a young small forward in Rudy Gay, so I’m not quite sure why they have interest here. If Pau Gasol’s status with Memphis is up in the air, I think that Wallace would be wary. Memphis also has about $4 million less available salary cap space than the Bucks.
Golden State: The Warriors can offer Wallace a chance to win and an up-tempo style that fits his game well. What can they offer the Bobcats? Al Harrington and Sarunas Jasikevicius would fit under the cap and give Michael Jordan a starting power forward as well as making room for Adam Morrison to step in. Jordan would be an idiot for accepting that trade “¦ but he’s never done anything else as a GM to suggest he is anything otherwise.
Portland: A dark-horse contender here. They have completely remade their roster and can make a pitch to Wallace as the missing veteran piece to a rising contender. They can offer Raef LaFrentz (plus 800,000 shares of Microsoft to pay off his contract), and young players like Martell Webster and (a favorite of mine) Sergio Rodriguez. A starting lineup of Jarret Jack, Brandon Roy, Wallace, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Greg Oden would be ready to go places now “¦ and maybe all the way in a couple of years.
Milwaukee: The Bucks offer the most salary cap room (probably up to $13 million) and a young, deep team that offers a pretty good chance to win now. Wallace can step right in ahead of Bobby Simmons, and he would be on a playoff-caliber team with 3 other starters under the age of 25. The Bucks also fit his playing style well, as they have plenty of other scorers and would allow Wallace to concentrate on what he does best: defense and picking up garbage points.
Charlotte: Assuming that Wallace doesn’t have any bad blood with the coaching staff or upper management (no reason to assume he does) then resigning with the Bobcats has to be considered the most likely option. They have no salary cap considerations, so could offer him a max-contract with ease. They do have a lot of young talent and just added a scorer in Jason Richardson. His one question with the Bobcats would have to be, what do they plan on doing with Adam Morrison? If it was me the answer would be “give up on him”, but Charlotte may be planning on moving him into the starting lineup. If that’s the truth then most likely Wallace will be in either Milwaukee or Portland next year.

Tags: Milwaukee Bucks

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 stormyq // Jul 5, 2007 at 7:37 am

    Howard would move to SG if Dallas signs Wallace. He would be a perfect fit.

  • 2 stormyq // Jul 5, 2007 at 7:39 am

    And your suggestion that Wallace would get 20 minutes a night is absurd and makes me wonder how much you really know about that team. GW, along with all the other starters will be down for 30-35 minutes with the bench filling in the rest.

  • 3 The Spin // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    Hello,
    I was wondering if you wanted to exchange links on our blogrolls. I have a general NBA blog called Clutch 3, with the address as:
    http://www.clutch3.com
    Let me know if your interested.
    Thanks

  • 4 The Spin // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:41 pm

    Sorry,
    My email is clutch3blog@gmail.com
    THanks!

  • 5 Brett // Jul 6, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    The biggest obstacle with Wallace-to-Dallas is what Dallas can offer Charlotte in a sign-and-trade. Any deal would start with Devin Harris, I’m sure, but Dallas would have to come up with another $8-$10 mil in salaries to send to the Bobcats. Nowitzki and Howard are out and Charlotte wouldn’t be interested in Terry. I don’t think Charlotte is interested in the 4yrs/$40 mil left on Dampier’s deal, and asking Dallas — a team that intends to contend for a title — to give up two starters (for the right to add another and switch the position of a fourth) is a reach. Dallas doesn’t have any large expiring contracts to throw in, or any draft picks with a reasonable chance of being very valuable.

    Josh Howard has played very little 2-guard in his NBA career and for a championship contender to move him (especially in order to replace him with a lesser player) is illogical. Moving Howard takes away two of his biggest strengths — his relative quickness advantage against other small forwards and his rebounding (by moving him away from the basket). Howard’s passing, while excellent for a forward, is nothing exceptional for a guard. Moving him would just be making a change for the sake of changing. It’s not worth it.

    The idea that “Wallace will sign for the midlevel in order to win” is a pipe dream. 24-year-old guys (especially those who have already been underpaid for 3 years) don’t do that. Money talks, and quite honestly he has as good a chance of being on a winner in Charlotte in 5 years as he would in Dallas. Besides, if joining a winner for cheap was his only motivation he would have probably already signed with San Antonio.

  • 6 mookie // Jul 8, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    “Charlotte wouldn’t be interested in Terry.”
    Really? Where did you hear this? I find that statement interesting. I think he’d win 6th man of the year in CHA.

  • 7 Brett // Jul 9, 2007 at 7:52 pm

    Terry’s contract is ridiculous and since any theoretical S+T would start with Harris, there’s no reason for Charlotte to want both of them — nor is there reason for Dallas to give up their entire backcourt.

Leave a Comment